<kbd id="afajh"><form id="afajh"></form></kbd>
<strong id="afajh"><dl id="afajh"></dl></strong>
    <del id="afajh"><form id="afajh"></form></del>
        1. <th id="afajh"><progress id="afajh"></progress></th>
          <b id="afajh"><abbr id="afajh"></abbr></b>
          <th id="afajh"><progress id="afajh"></progress></th>

          8種常見SQL錯誤用法

          共 13550字,需瀏覽 28分鐘

           ·

          2020-11-20 21:12

          作者:db匠

          原文鏈接:https://developer.aliyun.com/article/72501


          1、LIMIT 語句

          分頁查詢是最常用的場景之一,但也通常也是最容易出問題的地方。比如對于下面簡單的語句,一般 DBA 想到的辦法是在 type, name, create_time 字段上加組合索引。這樣條件排序都能有效的利用到索引,性能迅速提升。

          SELECT * FROM   operation WHERE  type = 'SQLStats'AND name = 'SlowLog'ORDER  BY create_time LIMIT  1000, 10;

          好吧,可能90%以上的 DBA 解決該問題就到此為止。但當(dāng) LIMIT 子句變成 “LIMIT 1000000,10” 時,程序員仍然會抱怨:我只取10條記錄為什么還是慢?

          要知道數(shù)據(jù)庫也并不知道第1000000條記錄從什么地方開始,即使有索引也需要從頭計算一次。出現(xiàn)這種性能問題,多數(shù)情形下是程序員偷懶了。

          在前端數(shù)據(jù)瀏覽翻頁,或者大數(shù)據(jù)分批導(dǎo)出等場景下,是可以將上一頁的最大值當(dāng)成參數(shù)作為查詢條件的。SQL 重新設(shè)計如下:

          SELECT   * FROM     operation WHERE    type = 'SQLStats'AND      name = 'SlowLog'AND      create_time > '2017-03-16 14:00:00'ORDER BY create_time limit 10;

          在新設(shè)計下查詢時間基本固定,不會隨著數(shù)據(jù)量的增長而發(fā)生變化。

          2、隱式轉(zhuǎn)換

          SQL語句中查詢變量和字段定義類型不匹配是另一個常見的錯誤。比如下面的語句:

          mysql> explain extended SELECT *      > FROM   my_balance b      > WHERE  b.bpn = 14000000123     >       AND b.isverified IS NULL ;mysql> show warnings;| Warning | 1739 | Cannot use ref access on index 'bpn' due to type or collation conversion on field 'bpn'

          其中字段 bpn 的定義為 varchar(20),MySQL 的策略是將字符串轉(zhuǎn)換為數(shù)字之后再比較。函數(shù)作用于表字段,索引失效。

          上述情況可能是應(yīng)用程序框架自動填入的參數(shù),而不是程序員的原意。現(xiàn)在應(yīng)用框架很多很繁雜,使用方便的同時也小心它可能給自己挖坑。

          3、關(guān)聯(lián)更新、刪除

          雖然 MySQL5.6 引入了物化特性,但需要特別注意它目前僅僅針對查詢語句的優(yōu)化。對于更新或刪除需要手工重寫成 JOIN。

          比如下面 UPDATE 語句,MySQL 實際執(zhí)行的是循環(huán)/嵌套子查詢(DEPENDENT SUBQUERY),其執(zhí)行時間可想而知。

          UPDATE operation o SET    status = 'applying'WHERE  o.id IN (SELECT idFROM   (SELECT o.id,                                o.status FROM   operation o WHERE  o.group = 123AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) ORDER  BY o.parent,                                   o.id LIMIT  1) t);

          執(zhí)行計劃:

          +----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type        | table | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                                               |+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| 1  | PRIMARY            | o     | index |               | PRIMARY | 8       |       | 24   | Using where; Using temporary                        || 2  | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY |       |       |               |         |         |       |      | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables || 3  | DERIVED            | o     | ref   | idx_2,idx_5   | idx_5   | 8       | const | 1    | Using where; Using filesort                         |+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+

          重寫為 JOIN 之后,子查詢的選擇模式從 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY 變成 DERIVED,執(zhí)行速度大大加快,從7秒降低到2毫秒。

          UPDATE operation o JOIN  (SELECT o.id,                             o.status FROM   operation o WHERE  o.group = 123AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) ORDER  BY o.parent,                                o.id LIMIT  1) tON o.id = t.id SET    status = 'applying'

          執(zhí)行計劃簡化為:

          +----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key   | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                                               |+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| 1  | PRIMARY     |       |      |               |       |         |       |      | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables || 2  | DERIVED     | o     | ref  | idx_2,idx_5   | idx_5 | 8       | const | 1    | Using where; Using filesort                         |+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+

          4、混合排序

          MySQL 不能利用索引進(jìn)行混合排序。但在某些場景,還是有機(jī)會使用特殊方法提升性能的。

          SELECT * FROM   my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id ORDER  BY a.is_reply ASC,           a.appraise_time DESCLIMIT  0, 20

          執(zhí)行計劃顯示為全表掃描:

          +----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys     | key     | key_len | ref      | rows    | Extra    +----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+|  1 | SIMPLE      | a     | ALL    | idx_orderid | NULL    | NULL    | NULL    | 1967647 | Using filesort ||  1 | SIMPLE      | o     | eq_ref | PRIMARY     | PRIMARY | 122     | a.orderid |       1 | NULL           |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------+---------+---------+-----------------+---------+-+

          由于 is_reply 只有0和1兩種狀態(tài),我們按照下面的方法重寫后,執(zhí)行時間從1.58秒降低到2毫秒。

          SELECT * FROM   ((SELECT *FROM   my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id AND is_reply = 0ORDER  BY appraise_time DESCLIMIT  0, 20) UNION ALL        (SELECT *FROM   my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id AND is_reply = 1ORDER  BY appraise_time DESCLIMIT  0, 20)) t ORDER  BY  is_reply ASC,           appraisetime DESCLIMIT  20;

          5、EXISTS語句

          MySQL 對待 EXISTS 子句時,仍然采用嵌套子查詢的執(zhí)行方式。如下面的 SQL 語句:

          SELECT *FROM   my_neighbor n LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id AND sra.user_id = 'xxx'WHERE  n.topic_status < 4AND EXISTS(SELECT 1FROM   message_info m WHERE  n.id = m.neighbor_id AND m.inuser = 'xxx') AND n.topic_type <> 5

          執(zhí)行計劃為:

          +----+--------------------+-------+------+-----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+| id | select_type        | table | type | possible_keys     | key   | key_len | ref   | rows    | Extra   |+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+|  1 | PRIMARY            | n     | ALL  |  | NULL     | NULL    | NULL  | 1086041 | Using where                   ||  1 | PRIMARY            | sra   | ref  |  | idx_user_id | 123     | const |       1 | Using where          ||  2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | m     | ref  |  | idx_message_info   | 122     | const |       1 | Using index condition; Using where |+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+

          去掉 exists 更改為 join,能夠避免嵌套子查詢,將執(zhí)行時間從1.93秒降低為1毫秒。

          SELECT *FROM   my_neighbor n INNER JOIN message_info m ON n.id = m.neighbor_id AND m.inuser = 'xxx'LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id AND sra.user_id = 'xxx'WHERE  n.topic_status < 4AND n.topic_type <> 5

          新的執(zhí)行計劃:

          +----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys     | key       | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                 |+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+|  1 | SIMPLE      | m     | ref    | | idx_message_info   | 122     | const    |    1 | Using index condition ||  1 | SIMPLE      | n     | eq_ref | | PRIMARY   | 122     | ighbor_id |    1 | Using where      ||  1 | SIMPLE      | sra   | ref    | | idx_user_id | 123     | const     |    1 | Using where           |+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+

          6、條件下推

          外部查詢條件不能夠下推到復(fù)雜的視圖或子查詢的情況有:

          • 聚合子查詢;
          • 含有 LIMIT 的子查詢;
          • UNION 或 UNION ALL 子查詢;
          • 輸出字段中的子查詢;
          如下面的語句,從執(zhí)行計劃可以看出其條件作用于聚合子查詢之后:
          SELECT * FROM   (SELECT target, Count(*) FROM   operation GROUP  BY target) t WHERE  target = 'rm-xxxx'
          +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+| id | select_type | table      | type  | possible_keys | key         | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra       |+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+|  1 | PRIMARY     |  | ref   | 0>   |  | 514     | const |    2 | Using where ||  2 | DERIVED     | operation  | index | idx_4         | idx_4       | 519     | NULL  |   20 | Using index |+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+
          確定從語義上查詢條件可以直接下推后,重寫如下:
          SELECT target, Count(*) FROM   operation WHERE  target = 'rm-xxxx'GROUP  BY target
          執(zhí)行計劃變?yōu)椋?/span>
          +----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+| 1 | SIMPLE | operation | ref | idx_4 | idx_4 | 514 | const | 1 | Using where; Using index |+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+
          關(guān)于 MySQL 外部條件不能下推的詳細(xì)解釋說明請參考文章:

          7、提前縮小范圍

          先上初始 SQL 語句:
          SELECT * FROM   my_order o LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u ON o.uid = u.uidLEFT JOIN my_productinfo p ON o.pid = p.pid WHERE  ( o.display = 0 ) AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) ORDER  BY o.selltime DESCLIMIT  0, 15
          該SQL語句原意是:先做一系列的左連接,然后排序取前15條記錄。從執(zhí)行計劃也可以看出,最后一步估算排序記錄數(shù)為90萬,時間消耗為12秒。
          +----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref             | rows   | Extra                                              |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | o     | ALL    | NULL          | NULL    | NULL    | NULL            | 909119 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort       ||  1 | SIMPLE      | u     | eq_ref | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 4       | o.uid |      1 | NULL                                               ||  1 | SIMPLE      | p     | ALL    | PRIMARY       | NULL    | NULL    | NULL            |      6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
          由于最后 WHERE 條件以及排序均針對最左主表,因此可以先對 my_order 排序提前縮小數(shù)據(jù)量再做左連接。SQL 重寫后如下,執(zhí)行時間縮小為1毫秒左右。
          SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM   my_order o WHERE  ( o.display = 0 ) AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) ORDER  BY o.selltime DESCLIMIT  0, 15) o LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u ON o.uid = u.uid LEFT JOIN my_productinfo p ON o.pid = p.pid ORDER BY  o.selltime DESClimit 0, 15
          再檢查執(zhí)行計劃:子查詢物化后(select_type=DERIVED)參與 JOIN。雖然估算行掃描仍然為90萬,但是利用了索引以及 LIMIT 子句后,實際執(zhí)行時間變得很小。
          +----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table      | type   | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref   | rows   | Extra                                              |+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+|  1 | PRIMARY     |  | ALL    | NULL          | NULL    | NULL    | NULL  |     15 | Using temporary; Using filesort                    ||  1 | PRIMARY     | u          | eq_ref | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 4       | o.uid |      1 | NULL                                               ||  1 | PRIMARY     | p          | ALL    | PRIMARY       | NULL    | NULL    | NULL  |      6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) ||  2 | DERIVED     | o          | index  | NULL          | idx_1   | 5       | NULL  | 909112 | Using where                                        |+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+

          8、中間結(jié)果集下推

          再來看下面這個已經(jīng)初步優(yōu)化過的例子(左連接中的主表優(yōu)先作用查詢條件):
          SELECT    a.*,           c.allocated FROM      ( SELECT   resourceid FROM     my_distribute d WHERE    isdelete = 0AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567'ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a LEFT JOIN          ( SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated FROM     my_resources GROUP BY resourcesid) c ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid
          那么該語句還存在其它問題嗎?不難看出子查詢 c 是全表聚合查詢,在表數(shù)量特別大的情況下會導(dǎo)致整個語句的性能下降。
          其實對于子查詢 c,左連接最后結(jié)果集只關(guān)心能和主表 resourceid 能匹配的數(shù)據(jù)。因此我們可以重寫語句如下,執(zhí)行時間從原來的2秒下降到2毫秒。
          SELECT    a.*,           c.allocated FROM      ( SELECT   resourceid FROM     my_distribute d WHERE    isdelete = 0AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567'ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a LEFT JOIN          ( SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated FROM     my_resources r,                             ( SELECT   resourceid FROM     my_distribute d WHERE    isdelete = 0AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567'ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a WHERE    r.resourcesid = a.resourcesid GROUP BY resourcesid) c ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid
          但是子查詢 a 在我們的SQL語句中出現(xiàn)了多次。這種寫法不僅存在額外的開銷,還使得整個語句顯的繁雜。使用 WITH 語句再次重寫:
          WITH a AS( SELECT   resourceid FROM     my_distribute d WHERE    isdelete = 0AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567'ORDER BY salecode limit 20)SELECT    a.*,           c.allocated FROM      a LEFT JOIN          ( SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated FROM     my_resources r,                             a WHERE    r.resourcesid = a.resourcesid GROUP BY resourcesid) c ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid

          總結(jié)

          數(shù)據(jù)庫編譯器產(chǎn)生執(zhí)行計劃,決定著SQL的實際執(zhí)行方式。但是編譯器只是盡力服務(wù),所有數(shù)據(jù)庫的編譯器都不是盡善盡美的。
          上述提到的多數(shù)場景,在其它數(shù)據(jù)庫中也存在性能問題。了解數(shù)據(jù)庫編譯器的特性,才能避規(guī)其短處,寫出高性能的SQL語句。
          程序員在設(shè)計數(shù)據(jù)模型以及編寫SQL語句時,要把算法的思想或意識帶進(jìn)來。
          編寫復(fù)雜SQL語句要養(yǎng)成使用 WITH 語句的習(xí)慣。簡潔且思路清晰的SQL語句也能減小數(shù)據(jù)庫的負(fù)擔(dān) 。

          有道無術(shù),術(shù)可成;有術(shù)無道,止于術(shù)

          歡迎大家關(guān)注Java之道公眾號


          好文章,我在看??

          瀏覽 36
          點贊
          評論
          收藏
          分享

          手機(jī)掃一掃分享

          分享
          舉報
          評論
          圖片
          表情
          推薦
          點贊
          評論
          收藏
          分享

          手機(jī)掃一掃分享

          分享
          舉報
          <kbd id="afajh"><form id="afajh"></form></kbd>
          <strong id="afajh"><dl id="afajh"></dl></strong>
            <del id="afajh"><form id="afajh"></form></del>
                1. <th id="afajh"><progress id="afajh"></progress></th>
                  <b id="afajh"><abbr id="afajh"></abbr></b>
                  <th id="afajh"><progress id="afajh"></progress></th>
                  北条麻妃中文字幕久 | 久久精品视频免费 | 99玖玖视频 | 国产操操逼视频 | 伊人永久在线 |