Spring-Retry重試實(shí)現(xiàn)原理
點(diǎn)擊上方藍(lán)色“程序猿DD”,選擇“設(shè)為星標(biāo)”
回復(fù)“資源”獲取獨(dú)家整理的學(xué)習(xí)資料!

作者 |?Alben
概要
Spring實(shí)現(xiàn)了一套重試機(jī)制,功能簡(jiǎn)單實(shí)用。Spring Retry是從Spring Batch獨(dú)立出來(lái)的一個(gè)功能,已經(jīng)廣泛應(yīng)用于Spring Batch,Spring Integration, Spring for Apache Hadoop等Spring項(xiàng)目。本文將講述如何使用Spring Retry及其實(shí)現(xiàn)原理。
背景
重試,其實(shí)我們其實(shí)很多時(shí)候都需要的,為了保證容錯(cuò)性,可用性,一致性等。一般用來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)外部系統(tǒng)的一些不可預(yù)料的返回、異常等,特別是網(wǎng)絡(luò)延遲,中斷等情況。還有在現(xiàn)在流行的微服務(wù)治理框架中,通常都有自己的重試與超時(shí)配置,比如dubbo可以設(shè)置retries=1,timeout=500調(diào)用失敗只重試1次,超過(guò)500ms調(diào)用仍未返回則調(diào)用失敗。如果我們要做重試,要為特定的某個(gè)操作做重試功能,則要硬編碼,大概邏輯基本都是寫個(gè)循環(huán),根據(jù)返回或異常,計(jì)數(shù)失敗次數(shù),然后設(shè)定退出條件。這樣做,且不說(shuō)每個(gè)操作都要寫這種類似的代碼,而且重試邏輯和業(yè)務(wù)邏輯混在一起,給維護(hù)和擴(kuò)展帶來(lái)了麻煩。從面向?qū)ο蟮慕嵌葋?lái)看,我們應(yīng)該把重試的代碼獨(dú)立出來(lái)。
使用介紹
基本使用
先舉個(gè)例子:
@Configuration
@EnableRetry
public?class?Application?{
????@Bean
????public?RetryService?retryService(){
????????return?new?RetryService();
????}
????public?static?void?main(String[]?args)?throws?Exception{
????????ApplicationContext?applicationContext?=?new?AnnotationConfigApplicationContext("springretry");
????????RetryService?service1?=?applicationContext.getBean("service",?RetryService.class);
????????service1.service();
????}
}
@Service("service")
public?class?RetryService?{
????@Retryable(value?=?IllegalAccessException.class,?maxAttempts?=?5,
????????????backoff=?@Backoff(value?=?1500,?maxDelay?=?100000,?multiplier?=?1.2))
????public?void?service()?throws?IllegalAccessException?{
????????System.out.println("service?method...");
????????throw?new?IllegalAccessException("manual?exception");
????}
????@Recover
????public?void?recover(IllegalAccessException?e){
????????System.out.println("service?retry?after?Recover?=>?"?+?e.getMessage());
????}
}
@EnableRetry - 表示開啟重試機(jī)制 @Retryable - 表示這個(gè)方法需要重試,它有很豐富的參數(shù),可以滿足你對(duì)重試的需求 @Backoff - 表示重試中的退避策略 @Recover - 兜底方法,即多次重試后還是失敗就會(huì)執(zhí)行這個(gè)方法
Spring-Retry 的功能豐富在于其重試策略和退避策略,還有兜底,監(jiān)聽器等操作。
然后每個(gè)注解里面的參數(shù),都是很簡(jiǎn)單的,大家看一下就知道是什么意思,怎么用了,我就不多講了。
重試策略
看一下Spring Retry自帶的一些重試策略,主要是用來(lái)判斷當(dāng)方法調(diào)用異常時(shí)是否需要重試。(下文原理部分會(huì)深入分析實(shí)現(xiàn))

SimpleRetryPolicy 默認(rèn)最多重試3次 TimeoutRetryPolicy 默認(rèn)在1秒內(nèi)失敗都會(huì)重試 ExpressionRetryPolicy 符合表達(dá)式就會(huì)重試 CircuitBreakerRetryPolicy 增加了熔斷的機(jī)制,如果不在熔斷狀態(tài),則允許重試 CompositeRetryPolicy 可以組合多個(gè)重試策略 NeverRetryPolicy 從不重試(也是一種重試策略哈) AlwaysRetryPolicy 總是重試
….等等
退避策略
看一下退避策略,退避是指怎么去做下一次的重試,在這里其實(shí)就是等待多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。(下文原理部分會(huì)深入分析實(shí)現(xiàn))

FixedBackOffPolicy 默認(rèn)固定延遲1秒后執(zhí)行下一次重試 ExponentialBackOffPolicy 指數(shù)遞增延遲執(zhí)行重試,默認(rèn)初始0.1秒,系數(shù)是2,那么下次延遲0.2秒,再下次就是延遲0.4秒,如此類推,最大30秒。 ExponentialRandomBackOffPolicy 在上面那個(gè)策略上增加隨機(jī)性 UniformRandomBackOffPolicy 這個(gè)跟上面的區(qū)別就是,上面的延遲會(huì)不停遞增,這個(gè)只會(huì)在固定的區(qū)間隨機(jī) StatelessBackOffPolicy 這個(gè)說(shuō)明是無(wú)狀態(tài)的,所謂無(wú)狀態(tài)就是對(duì)上次的退避無(wú)感知,從它下面的子類也能看出來(lái)
原理
原理部分我想分開兩部分來(lái)講,一是重試機(jī)制的切入點(diǎn),即它是如何使得你的代碼實(shí)現(xiàn)重試功能的;二是重試機(jī)制的詳細(xì),包括重試的邏輯以及重試策略和退避策略的實(shí)現(xiàn)。
切入點(diǎn)
@EnableRetry
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@EnableAspectJAutoProxy(proxyTargetClass?=?false)
@Import(RetryConfiguration.class)
@Documented
public?@interface?EnableRetry?{
?/**
??*?Indicate?whether?subclass-based?(CGLIB)?proxies?are?to?be?created?as?opposed
??*?to?standard?Java?interface-based?proxies.?The?default?is?{@code?false}.
??*
??*?@return?whether?to?proxy?or?not?to?proxy?the?class
??*/
?boolean?proxyTargetClass()?default?false;
}
我們可以看到?@EnableAspectJAutoProxy(proxyTargetClass = false)?這個(gè)并不陌生,就是打開Spring AOP功能。重點(diǎn)看看@Import(RetryConfiguration.class)?@Import相當(dāng)于注冊(cè)這個(gè)Bean
我們看看這個(gè)RetryConfiguration是個(gè)什么東西?

它是一個(gè)AbstractPointcutAdvisor,它有一個(gè)pointcut和一個(gè)advice。我們知道,在IOC過(guò)程中會(huì)根據(jù)PointcutAdvisor類來(lái)對(duì)Bean進(jìn)行Pointcut的過(guò)濾,然后生成對(duì)應(yīng)的AOP代理類,用advice來(lái)加強(qiáng)處理。看看RetryConfiguration的初始化:
@PostConstruct
?public?void?init()?{
??Set>?retryableAnnotationTypes?=?new?LinkedHashSet>(1);
??retryableAnnotationTypes.add(Retryable.class);
????????//創(chuàng)建pointcut
??this.pointcut?=?buildPointcut(retryableAnnotationTypes);
????????//創(chuàng)建advice
??this.advice?=?buildAdvice();
??if?(this.advice?instanceof?BeanFactoryAware)?{
???((BeanFactoryAware)?this.advice).setBeanFactory(beanFactory);
??}
?}
protected?Pointcut?buildPointcut(Set>?retryAnnotationTypes) ?{
??ComposablePointcut?result?=?null;
??for?(Class?extends?Annotation>?retryAnnotationType?:?retryAnnotationTypes)?{
???Pointcut?filter?=?new?AnnotationClassOrMethodPointcut(retryAnnotationType);
???if?(result?==?null)?{
????result?=?new?ComposablePointcut(filter);
???}
???else?{
????result.union(filter);
???}
??}
??return?result;
?}
上面代碼用到了AnnotationClassOrMethodPointcut,其實(shí)它最終還是用到了AnnotationMethodMatcher來(lái)根據(jù)注解進(jìn)行切入點(diǎn)的過(guò)濾。這里就是@Retryable注解了。
//創(chuàng)建advice對(duì)象,即攔截器
???protected?Advice?buildAdvice()?{
????//下面關(guān)注這個(gè)對(duì)象
?AnnotationAwareRetryOperationsInterceptor?interceptor?=?new?AnnotationAwareRetryOperationsInterceptor();
?if?(retryContextCache?!=?null)?{
??interceptor.setRetryContextCache(retryContextCache);
?}
?if?(retryListeners?!=?null)?{
??interceptor.setListeners(retryListeners);
?}
?if?(methodArgumentsKeyGenerator?!=?null)?{
??interceptor.setKeyGenerator(methodArgumentsKeyGenerator);
?}
?if?(newMethodArgumentsIdentifier?!=?null)?{
??interceptor.setNewItemIdentifier(newMethodArgumentsIdentifier);
?}
?if?(sleeper?!=?null)?{
??interceptor.setSleeper(sleeper);
?}
?return?interceptor;
}
AnnotationAwareRetryOperationsInterceptor
繼承關(guān)系?

可以看出AnnotationAwareRetryOperationsInterceptor是一個(gè)MethodInterceptor,在創(chuàng)建AOP代理過(guò)程中如果目標(biāo)方法符合pointcut的規(guī)則,它就會(huì)加到interceptor列表中,然后做增強(qiáng),我們看看invoke方法做了什么增強(qiáng)。
@Override
?public?Object?invoke(MethodInvocation?invocation)?throws?Throwable?{
??MethodInterceptor?delegate?=?getDelegate(invocation.getThis(),?invocation.getMethod());
??if?(delegate?!=?null)?{
???return?delegate.invoke(invocation);
??}
??else?{
???return?invocation.proceed();
??}
?}
這里用到了委托,主要是需要根據(jù)配置委托給具體“有狀態(tài)”的interceptor還是“無(wú)狀態(tài)”的interceptor。
private?MethodInterceptor?getDelegate(Object?target,?Method?method)?{
??if?(!this.delegates.containsKey(target)?||?!this.delegates.get(target).containsKey(method))?{
???synchronized?(this.delegates)?{
????if?(!this.delegates.containsKey(target))?{
?????this.delegates.put(target,?new?HashMap());
????}
????Map?delegatesForTarget?=?this.delegates.get(target);
????if?(!delegatesForTarget.containsKey(method))?{
?????Retryable?retryable?=?AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(method,?Retryable.class);
?????if?(retryable?==?null)?{
??????retryable?=?AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(method.getDeclaringClass(),?Retryable.class);
?????}
?????if?(retryable?==?null)?{
??????retryable?=?findAnnotationOnTarget(target,?method);
?????}
?????if?(retryable?==?null)?{
??????return?delegatesForTarget.put(method,?null);
?????}
?????MethodInterceptor?delegate;
?????//支持自定義MethodInterceptor,而且優(yōu)先級(jí)最高
?????if?(StringUtils.hasText(retryable.interceptor()))?{
??????delegate?=?this.beanFactory.getBean(retryable.interceptor(),?MethodInterceptor.class);
?????}
?????else?if?(retryable.stateful())?{
?????????????????????//得到“有狀態(tài)”的interceptor
??????delegate?=?getStatefulInterceptor(target,?method,?retryable);
?????}
?????else?{
?????????????????????//得到“無(wú)狀態(tài)”的interceptor
??????delegate?=?getStatelessInterceptor(target,?method,?retryable);
?????}
?????delegatesForTarget.put(method,?delegate);
????}
???}
??}
??return?this.delegates.get(target).get(method);
?}
getStatefulInterceptor和getStatelessInterceptor都是差不多,我們先看看比較簡(jiǎn)單的getStatelessInterceptor。
private?MethodInterceptor?getStatelessInterceptor(Object?target,?Method?method,?Retryable?retryable)?{
??//生成一個(gè)RetryTemplate
??RetryTemplate?template?=?createTemplate(retryable.listeners());
??//生成retryPolicy
??template.setRetryPolicy(getRetryPolicy(retryable));
??//生成backoffPolicy
??template.setBackOffPolicy(getBackoffPolicy(retryable.backoff()));
??return?RetryInterceptorBuilder.stateless()
????.retryOperations(template)
????.label(retryable.label())
????.recoverer(getRecoverer(target,?method))
????.build();
?}
具體生成retryPolicy和backoffPolicy的規(guī)則,我們等下再回頭來(lái)看。RetryInterceptorBuilder其實(shí)就是為了生成RetryOperationsInterceptor。RetryOperationsInterceptor也是一個(gè)MethodInterceptor,我們來(lái)看看它的invoke方法。
public?Object?invoke(final?MethodInvocation?invocation)?throws?Throwable?{
??String?name;
??if?(StringUtils.hasText(label))?{
???name?=?label;
??}?else?{
???name?=?invocation.getMethod().toGenericString();
??}
??final?String?label?=?name;
??//定義了一個(gè)RetryCallback,其實(shí)看它的doWithRetry方法,調(diào)用了invocation的proceed()方法,是不是有點(diǎn)眼熟,這就是AOP的攔截鏈調(diào)用,如果沒(méi)有攔截鏈,那就是對(duì)原來(lái)方法的調(diào)用。
??RetryCallback無(wú)論是RetryOperationsInterceptor還是StatefulRetryOperationsInterceptor,最終的攔截處理邏輯還是調(diào)用到RetryTemplate的execute方法,從名字也看出來(lái),RetryTemplate作為一個(gè)模板類,里面包含了重試統(tǒng)一邏輯。不過(guò),我看這個(gè)RetryTemplate并不是很“模板”,因?yàn)樗鼪](méi)有很多可以擴(kuò)展的地方。
重試邏輯及策略實(shí)現(xiàn)
上面介紹了Spring Retry利用了AOP代理使重試機(jī)制對(duì)業(yè)務(wù)代碼進(jìn)行“入侵”。下面我們繼續(xù)看看重試的邏輯做了什么。RetryTemplate的doExecute方法。
protected??T?doExecute(RetryCallback?retryCallback,
???RecoveryCallback?recoveryCallback,?RetryState?state)
???throws?E,?ExhaustedRetryException?{
??RetryPolicy?retryPolicy?=?this.retryPolicy;
??BackOffPolicy?backOffPolicy?=?this.backOffPolicy;
??//新建一個(gè)RetryContext來(lái)保存本輪重試的上下文
??RetryContext?context?=?open(retryPolicy,?state);
??if?(this.logger.isTraceEnabled())?{
???this.logger.trace("RetryContext?retrieved:?"?+?context);
??}
??//?Make?sure?the?context?is?available?globally?for?clients?who?need
??//?it...
??RetrySynchronizationManager.register(context);
??Throwable?lastException?=?null;
??boolean?exhausted?=?false;
??try?{
???//如果有注冊(cè)RetryListener,則會(huì)調(diào)用它的open方法,給調(diào)用者一個(gè)通知。
???boolean?running?=?doOpenInterceptors(retryCallback,?context);
???if?(!running)?{
????throw?new?TerminatedRetryException(
??????"Retry?terminated?abnormally?by?interceptor?before?first?attempt");
???}
???//?Get?or?Start?the?backoff?context...
???BackOffContext?backOffContext?=?null;
???Object?resource?=?context.getAttribute("backOffContext");
???if?(resource?instanceof?BackOffContext)?{
????backOffContext?=?(BackOffContext)?resource;
???}
???if?(backOffContext?==?null)?{
????backOffContext?=?backOffPolicy.start(context);
????if?(backOffContext?!=?null)?{
?????context.setAttribute("backOffContext",?backOffContext);
????}
???}
???//判斷能否重試,就是調(diào)用RetryPolicy的canRetry方法來(lái)判斷。
???//這個(gè)循環(huán)會(huì)直到原方法不拋出異常,或不需要再重試
???while?(canRetry(retryPolicy,?context)?&&?!context.isExhaustedOnly())?{
????try?{
?????if?(this.logger.isDebugEnabled())?{
??????this.logger.debug("Retry:?count="?+?context.getRetryCount());
?????}
?????//清除上次記錄的異常
?????lastException?=?null;
?????//doWithRetry方法,一般來(lái)說(shuō)就是原方法
?????return?retryCallback.doWithRetry(context);
????}
????catch?(Throwable?e)?{
?????//原方法拋出了異常
?????lastException?=?e;
?????try?{
??????//記錄異常信息
??????registerThrowable(retryPolicy,?state,?context,?e);
?????}
?????catch?(Exception?ex)?{
??????throw?new?TerminatedRetryException("Could?not?register?throwable",
????????ex);
?????}
?????finally?{
??????//調(diào)用RetryListener的onError方法
??????doOnErrorInterceptors(retryCallback,?context,?e);
?????}
?????//再次判斷能否重試
?????if?(canRetry(retryPolicy,?context)?&&?!context.isExhaustedOnly())?{
??????try?{
???????//如果可以重試則走退避策略
???????backOffPolicy.backOff(backOffContext);
??????}
??????catch?(BackOffInterruptedException?ex)?{
???????lastException?=?e;
???????//?back?off?was?prevented?by?another?thread?-?fail?the?retry
???????if?(this.logger.isDebugEnabled())?{
????????this.logger
??????????.debug("Abort?retry?because?interrupted:?count="
????????????+?context.getRetryCount());
???????}
???????throw?ex;
??????}
?????}
?????if?(this.logger.isDebugEnabled())?{
??????this.logger.debug(
????????"Checking?for?rethrow:?count="?+?context.getRetryCount());
?????}
?????if?(shouldRethrow(retryPolicy,?context,?state))?{
??????if?(this.logger.isDebugEnabled())?{
???????this.logger.debug("Rethrow?in?retry?for?policy:?count="
?????????+?context.getRetryCount());
??????}
??????throw?RetryTemplate.wrapIfNecessary(e);
?????}
????}
????/*
?????*?A?stateful?attempt?that?can?retry?may?rethrow?the?exception?before?now,
?????*?but?if?we?get?this?far?in?a?stateful?retry?there's?a?reason?for?it,
?????*?like?a?circuit?breaker?or?a?rollback?classifier.
?????*/
????if?(state?!=?null?&&?context.hasAttribute(GLOBAL_STATE))?{
?????break;
????}
???}
???if?(state?==?null?&&?this.logger.isDebugEnabled())?{
????this.logger.debug(
??????"Retry?failed?last?attempt:?count="?+?context.getRetryCount());
???}
???exhausted?=?true;
???//重試結(jié)束后如果有兜底R(shí)ecovery方法則執(zhí)行,否則拋異常
???return?handleRetryExhausted(recoveryCallback,?context,?state);
??}
??catch?(Throwable?e)?{
???throw?RetryTemplate.wrapIfNecessary(e);
??}
??finally?{
???//處理一些關(guān)閉邏輯
???close(retryPolicy,?context,?state,?lastException?==?null?||?exhausted);
???//調(diào)用RetryListener的close方法
???doCloseInterceptors(retryCallback,?context,?lastException);
???RetrySynchronizationManager.clear();
??}
?}
主要核心重試邏輯就是上面的代碼了,看上去還是挺簡(jiǎn)單的。在上面,我們漏掉了RetryPolicy的canRetry方法和BackOffPolicy的backOff方法,以及這兩個(gè)Policy是怎么來(lái)的。我們回頭看看getStatelessInterceptor方法中的getRetryPolicy和getRetryPolicy方法。
private?RetryPolicy?getRetryPolicy(Annotation?retryable)?{
??Map?attrs?=?AnnotationUtils.getAnnotationAttributes(retryable);
??@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
??Class?extends?Throwable>[]?includes?=?(Class?extends?Throwable>[])?attrs.get("value");
??String?exceptionExpression?=?(String)?attrs.get("exceptionExpression");
??boolean?hasExpression?=?StringUtils.hasText(exceptionExpression);
??if?(includes.length?==?0)?{
???@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
???Class?extends?Throwable>[]?value?=?(Class?extends?Throwable>[])?attrs.get("include");
???includes?=?value;
??}
??@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
??Class?extends?Throwable>[]?excludes?=?(Class?extends?Throwable>[])?attrs.get("exclude");
??Integer?maxAttempts?=?(Integer)?attrs.get("maxAttempts");
??String?maxAttemptsExpression?=?(String)?attrs.get("maxAttemptsExpression");
??if?(StringUtils.hasText(maxAttemptsExpression))?{
???maxAttempts?=?PARSER.parseExpression(resolve(maxAttemptsExpression),?PARSER_CONTEXT)
?????.getValue(this.evaluationContext,?Integer.class);
??}
??if?(includes.length?==?0?&&?excludes.length?==?0)?{
???SimpleRetryPolicy?simple?=?hasExpression???new?ExpressionRetryPolicy(resolve(exceptionExpression))
???????????????.withBeanFactory(this.beanFactory)
??????????????:?new?SimpleRetryPolicy();
???simple.setMaxAttempts(maxAttempts);
???return?simple;
??}
??Map,?Boolean>?policyMap?=?new?HashMap,?Boolean>();
??for?(Class?extends?Throwable>?type?:?includes)?{
???policyMap.put(type,?true);
??}
??for?(Class?extends?Throwable>?type?:?excludes)?{
???policyMap.put(type,?false);
??}
??boolean?retryNotExcluded?=?includes.length?==?0;
??if?(hasExpression)?{
???return?new?ExpressionRetryPolicy(maxAttempts,?policyMap,?true,?exceptionExpression,?retryNotExcluded)
?????.withBeanFactory(this.beanFactory);
??}
??else?{
???return?new?SimpleRetryPolicy(maxAttempts,?policyMap,?true,?retryNotExcluded);
??}
?}
嗯~,代碼不難,這里簡(jiǎn)單做一下總結(jié)好了。就是通過(guò)@Retryable注解中的參數(shù),來(lái)判斷具體使用文章開頭說(shuō)到的哪個(gè)重試策略,是SimpleRetryPolicy還是ExpressionRetryPolicy等。
private?BackOffPolicy?getBackoffPolicy(Backoff?backoff)?{
??long?min?=?backoff.delay()?==?0???backoff.value()?:?backoff.delay();
??if?(StringUtils.hasText(backoff.delayExpression()))?{
???min?=?PARSER.parseExpression(resolve(backoff.delayExpression()),?PARSER_CONTEXT)
?????.getValue(this.evaluationContext,?Long.class);
??}
??long?max?=?backoff.maxDelay();
??if?(StringUtils.hasText(backoff.maxDelayExpression()))?{
???max?=?PARSER.parseExpression(resolve(backoff.maxDelayExpression()),?PARSER_CONTEXT)
?????.getValue(this.evaluationContext,?Long.class);
??}
??double?multiplier?=?backoff.multiplier();
??if?(StringUtils.hasText(backoff.multiplierExpression()))?{
???multiplier?=?PARSER.parseExpression(resolve(backoff.multiplierExpression()),?PARSER_CONTEXT)
?????.getValue(this.evaluationContext,?Double.class);
??}
??if?(multiplier?>?0)?{
???ExponentialBackOffPolicy?policy?=?new?ExponentialBackOffPolicy();
???if?(backoff.random())?{
????policy?=?new?ExponentialRandomBackOffPolicy();
???}
???policy.setInitialInterval(min);
???policy.setMultiplier(multiplier);
???policy.setMaxInterval(max?>?min???max?:?ExponentialBackOffPolicy.DEFAULT_MAX_INTERVAL);
???if?(this.sleeper?!=?null)?{
????policy.setSleeper(this.sleeper);
???}
???return?policy;
??}
??if?(max?>?min)?{
???UniformRandomBackOffPolicy?policy?=?new?UniformRandomBackOffPolicy();
???policy.setMinBackOffPeriod(min);
???policy.setMaxBackOffPeriod(max);
???if?(this.sleeper?!=?null)?{
????policy.setSleeper(this.sleeper);
???}
???return?policy;
??}
??FixedBackOffPolicy?policy?=?new?FixedBackOffPolicy();
??policy.setBackOffPeriod(min);
??if?(this.sleeper?!=?null)?{
???policy.setSleeper(this.sleeper);
??}
??return?policy;
?}
嗯~,一樣的味道。就是通過(guò)@Backoff注解中的參數(shù),來(lái)判斷具體使用文章開頭說(shuō)到的哪個(gè)退避策略,是FixedBackOffPolicy還是UniformRandomBackOffPolicy等。
那么每個(gè)RetryPolicy都會(huì)重寫canRetry方法,然后在RetryTemplate判斷是否需要重試。我們看看SimpleRetryPolicy的
@Override
?public?boolean?canRetry(RetryContext?context)?{
??Throwable?t?=?context.getLastThrowable();
??//判斷拋出的異常是否符合重試的異常
??//還有,是否超過(guò)了重試的次數(shù)
??return?(t?==?null?||?retryForException(t))?&&?context.getRetryCount()??}
同樣,我們看看FixedBackOffPolicy的退避方法。
protected?void?doBackOff()?throws?BackOffInterruptedException?{
??try?{
???//就是sleep固定的時(shí)間
???sleeper.sleep(backOffPeriod);
??}
??catch?(InterruptedException?e)?{
???throw?new?BackOffInterruptedException("Thread?interrupted?while?sleeping",?e);
??}
?}
至此,重試的主要原理以及邏輯大概就是這樣了。
RetryContext
我覺(jué)得有必要說(shuō)說(shuō)RetryContext,先看看它的繼承關(guān)系。

可以看出對(duì)每一個(gè)策略都有對(duì)應(yīng)的Context。
在Spring Retry里,其實(shí)每一個(gè)策略都是單例來(lái)的。我剛開始直覺(jué)是對(duì)每一個(gè)需要重試的方法都會(huì)new一個(gè)策略,這樣重試策略之間才不會(huì)產(chǎn)生沖突,但是一想就知道這樣就可能多出了很多策略對(duì)象出來(lái),增加了使用者的負(fù)擔(dān),這不是一個(gè)好的設(shè)計(jì)。Spring Retry采用了一個(gè)更加輕量級(jí)的做法,就是針對(duì)每一個(gè)需要重試的方法只new一個(gè)上下文Context對(duì)象,然后在重試時(shí),把這個(gè)Context傳到策略里,策略再根據(jù)這個(gè)Context做重試,而且Spring Retry還對(duì)這個(gè)Context做了cache。這樣就相當(dāng)于對(duì)重試的上下文做了優(yōu)化。
總結(jié)
Spring Retry通過(guò)AOP機(jī)制來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)業(yè)務(wù)代碼的重試”入侵“,RetryTemplate中包含了核心的重試邏輯,還提供了豐富的重試策略和退避策略。
參考資料
http://www.10tiao.com/html/164/201705/2652898434/1.html https://www.jianshu.com/p/58e753ca0151 https://paper.tuisec.win/detail/90bd660fad92183
DD自研的滬牌代拍業(yè)務(wù),點(diǎn)擊直達(dá)
【往期推薦】
2020-12-04
2020-12-04
2020-12-03
2020-12-03
2020-12-02
2020-12-01
掃一掃,關(guān)注我
一起學(xué)習(xí),一起進(jìn)步
每周贈(zèng)書,福利不斷
﹀
﹀
﹀
深度內(nèi)容
推薦加入




